Let’s be honest: most CTOs don’t struggle with the idea of remote. They struggle with execution.
They try to apply in-office rules to remote teams, or assume async means disconnected. And they often treat nearshore developers like outsourced vendors instead of integrated teammates.
The truth? Building remote teams in 2025 isn’t just about Slack and Zoom; it’s about structure, trust, and how you lead from the beginning.
Here’s what we’ve seen go wrong, and what the best leaders do instead.
1. Mistaking “remote” for “hands-off”
Too many leaders back off once someone’s remote, assuming autonomy = isolation. But distributed teams still need clarity, mentorship, and feedback loops.
According to a 2025 report from Remote.com, 59% of engineering leaders say their remote teams underperform when onboarding is inconsistent or rushed.
What to do:
Use structured check-ins, sprint reviews, and async updates, without micromanagement.
2. Relying only on tools instead of trust
You can give your team Notion, Slack, Jira, and GitHub, but without trust and visibility, nothing sticks. Remote work requires deeper relationship-building, not just more software.
What to do:
Create systems for psychological safety: shout-outs, post-mortems, and 1:1s that aren’t just status reports.
➡️ Related: Why “Outsourced” Still Gets a Bad Rap
3. Ignoring cultural and time zone overlap
One of the biggest mistakes when building remote teams is defaulting to offshore talent without considering collaboration. A dev team 13 hours ahead slows down decisions and increases rework.
What to do:
Favor nearshore teams in Latin America or aligned regions. Real-time collaboration equals faster feedback equals fewer bugs.
Companies with time zone-aligned remote teams report 21% higher delivery efficiency, according to a 2025 BlueCoding benchmark.
4. Over-indexing on individual output
Remote success isn’t just about “who shipped the most tickets.” It’s about collaboration, cross-functionality, and team momentum.
Sure, these metrics are easy to track. But they don’t tell the whole story—and in remote environments, they often hide real issues.
Here’s what we’ve seen go wrong:
- Developers hit their numbers, but ignore blockers that hurt the rest of the team
- PMs get deliverables, but not communication
- Engineers work in silos, leading to inconsistent architecture and growing tech debt
- “Quiet quitting” becomes invisible until it snowballs
What to do:
Shift from measuring activity to measuring impact. Remote teams thrive when they’re assessed on what they create together, not just what they do alone.
Here’s how:
- Track team-level metrics: completion of shared goals, on-time delivery, code integration success
- Encourage peer reviews and cross-functional collaboration as part of performance evaluations
- Incorporate soft signals: responsiveness, clarity in PRs, helpfulness in async forums
- Prioritize healthy velocity, not just raw speed (look at sprint health)
What happens when you get this right
- Projects flow more smoothly because people are aligned, not competing
- Devs feel more connected to outcomes, not just tasks
- Burnout drops because the pressure isn’t all on the “top performer”
- Leadership has real visibility into how the team is doing, not just how each person is coding
The fix isn’t more meetings or more tools. It’s smarter management, better metrics, and a commitment to team health.
Final thoughts
Building remote teams isn’t just about flexibility; it’s about design.
When you build right, remote teams outperform. When you cut corners, they collapse under misalignment.
➡️ Want a partner who knows how to build remote teams that actually work? Talk to us
➡️ Explore more: The 5 Most Common Misconceptions About Nearshore Staffing
Key Takeaways
What do CTOs often get wrong about remote teams?
They treat remote as passive, rely too heavily on tools, and neglect real onboarding and team engagement.
How do I build high-performing remote teams?
Focus on structure, timezone overlap, psychological safety, and performance based on outcomes—not just activity.
Is nearshore better for remote engineering teams?
Yes. Nearshore provides real-time collaboration, shared language/culture, and faster feedback loops.
Leave a Comment